WAIT A SECOND - read this again ... McCabe tells RR that he’s opened the investigation on POTUS! Then explains that RR QUESTIONS him on what he means by “collusion” ... then, as we already know, RR turns everything over to the Mule instead and lets McCabe set the table for his own firing. TBD ;)
I think you’ve got it!
Thank you, I always appreciate your views. Makes things clear.
WAIT A SECOND - read this again ... McCabe tells RR that he’s opened the investigation on POTUS! Then explains that RR QUESTIONS him on what he means by “collusion” ... then, as we already know, RR turns everything over to the Mule instead and lets McCabe set the table for his own firing. TBD ;)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ah but as DAG of the DOJ, he’s never supposed to assist, support or countenance a 2 plus year illicit effort to undermine the presidency. The DOJ was weaponized to bring down POTUS with the initiation and contined support of RR. From the time he was told they were going after POTUS, RR had an obligation as DAG to engage 100% in evaluating the evidence before a) choosing a special prosecutor or b) refusing to comply and reporting the threat to the POTUS and therefore our country.
I think RR would ask what McCabe meant by ‘collusion’ because it’s an assertion foreign to normal proceedings (it’s not a crime and there’s no historic precedent for it). I believe RR was asking ‘wut?’ and then ‘what do have to support that (so-called) ‘crime’?
Just my 2. :D