[Yosemitest]

Okay,:

Dr Heather Graven - Fossil fuel emissions will complicate radiocarbon dating, warns scientist

Dr. Alan Zindler - ERRORS ARE FEARED IN CARBON DATING

E Marian Scott • Gordon T Cook • Philip Naysmith - ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY IN RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS

Dr Steven Austin - Radio-dating in Rubble

And then there's this evidence:

Radiometric Dating Debunked in 3 Minutes ( 3:05 )

[TexasGator]

“Dr Heather Graven - Fossil fuel emissions will complicate radiocarbon dating, warns scientist”

ROTFLMAO!

He says in the future it ma be affected!So you have put up the argument that carbon dating IS a good method! THANK YOU!

---

The new study indicates that by 2020, the fraction of carbon-14 could drop to such an extent that radiocarbon dating will start to be affected.

[TexasGator]

“Dr. Alan Zindler - ERRORS ARE FEARED IN CARBON DATING
“

Debunked? I dont think so!

---

”The largest deviation, 3,500 years, was obtained for samples that are about 20,000 years old.”

[TexasGator]

E Marian Scott • Gordon T Cook • Philip Naysmith - ERROR AND UNCERTAINTY IN RADIOCARBON MEASUREMENTS

4497 +/- 12 years!

ALL YOUR LINKS SUPPORT CARBON DATING!

[TexasGator]

“Dr Steven Austin - Radio-dating in Rubble”

ROTFLMAO!

---

https://www.noanswersingenesis.org.au/mt_st_helens_dacite_kh.htm

This laboratory no longer performs K-Ar dating. However, when they did, their website clearly stated in a footnote that their equipment could not accurately date rocks that are younger than about 2 million years old “