I accept that, but in this case what we think is irrelevant. So why risk the thread over:He's not qualified, engineering-wise, to assert the conclusions he does,?
What posters in general view as what constitutes "unwelcome 9/11 truther material" is not just relevant, it is the point.
Trump says terrorists took out the buildings. Truthers dispute that bottom line. At least the way I see "truthers" being unwelcome here.
My point that "Trump isn't advancing a truther theory" stands separately from the fact that Trump isn't qualified to opine that a bomb in the plane is necessary for the plane to pierce the outer wall of the building.
He’s not qualified, engineering-wise, to assert the conclusions he does, but everybody has the right to uninformed opinion.
**************************************
Believe some qualified engineers asserted bombs in the bldgs.