Posted on 09/07/2019 8:41:49 PM PDT by ransomnote
Will mooslimes need to change Mohammeds name? I hadnt thought about ham being in the name. Or will they be further hypocrites about being offended about ham.
MOMED???
HEAD’S UP: Michael Flynn Hearing today
What the hell is that???? I never saw that, didn’t watch much of the Olympics in 2012...amazing that I never heard or read anything about that monstrosity. They’re rubbing our faces in their depravity and until Q came along most of us never even realized it.
I posted a short twitter thread about this yesterday with links to more info. I’d find but can’t right now but it’s on this thread, just check my name in forum.
I think a bunch of us realized it but had no idea of how to step the depravity train.
ME:I call B.S. on that.
YOU: Thats an operating theory. You can choose to disbelieve it or not. Or you can choose to support or debunk with facts. Calling BS is not debunking. Its stating an opinion. And Im fine with that, Ive done it myself. As long as no one regards that as the end of the discussion or some final pronouncement of what we all should think, thats fine.
ME: Fair enough. My "I call B.S." was the summary of my attempted debunking of the theory, based on the fact that the recounts showed no signs of every being "stood down", it was the most recounts ever in a Presidential election, apparetly over $4 million was devoted to the effort, and several continued to completion.
I agree, it's not definative, especially if more evidence comes out to support it tomorrow.
I did find the theory presented to be outlandish. I don't think you should believe me more than the random Twitter dude, but the evidence I presented is factually correct and available from many sources and so it's possible to validate it (if you have any doubts about it, which you probably don't).
Youve completely ignored the part of the theory dealing with HRCs disappearance. Is that because you agree with that part?
It didn't jump out at me as obviously at odds with the facts as we know them in the way that the claim that the recounts were "stood down" did.
The question of Hillary's arrest goes all the way back to Q's very first couple of posts. Q post #1:
From Qmap.pub
Anonymous
28 Oct 2017 - 1:44:28 PM
Anonymous>>147005381
28 Oct 2017 - 12:33:50 PM
>>146981635
Hillary Clinton will be arrested between 7:45 AM - 8:30 AM EST on Monday - the morning on< Oct 30, 2017.
HRC extradition already in motion effective yesterday with several countries in case of cross border run. Passport approved to be flagged effective 10/30 @ 12:01am. Expect massive riots organized in defiance and others fleeing the US to occur. US Ms will conduct the operation while NG activated. Proof check: Locate a NG member and ask if activated for duty 10/30 across most major cities.
Q Post #2 clarifies that she has been detained, not arrested.
So, those claims (regarding HRC) are not new, in fact that are part of the foundation of Q. Their has been lots of discussion of them previously, I have nothing new to add to what's been said on either side of that discussion.
I am now cleaning up coffee snot. Thanks! KEK!
How does he do that?
this is pretty far out there.
some things make the story seem believable:
1. no name wearing “boot” on alternate legs
2. hildabeast wearing “boot” on alternate legs.
3. bubba & hildabeast flying side by side on commercial
some things hard to swallow:
1. leverage night scenario of nov 8 & 9th before trump sworn in
2. “how was the military able to become involved immediately after the win that night since technically and constitutionally the commander in chief was still Obama ?”
Epstein Did Not Die in His Prison Cell: FEDS
Jeffrey Epstein was removed from his prison cell to another part of the Metropolitan Correctional Center hours before his death, casting serious doubt about the narrative surrounding the pedophiles reported suicide, federal law enforcement sources said.
The shocking revelations, if true, shatter the Justice Departments narrative that Epstein hung himself in his cell with a prison bed sheet.
https://truepundit.com/epstein-did-not-die-in-his-prison-cell-feds/
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.207 📁
Sep 10 2018 12:41:01 (EST)
DECLAS OF FISA WILL INITIATE THE RESIGNATION/RECUSAL AND/OR REMOVAL OF ROD ROSENSTEIN.
DECLAS OF FISA WILL INITIATE THE 'AWARENESS' THAT ALL SIGNERS WILL BE [CURRENTLY] UNDER INVESTIGATION.
DECLAS OF FISA WILL FACTUALLY DEMONSTRATE WITHOUT ARGUMENT THE US GOVERNMENT, UNDER HUSSEIN, KNOWINGLY, PRESENTED FALSE EVIDENCE TO FISC IN AN EFFORT TO OBTAIN 'LEGAL' US INTELLIGENCE 'UMBRELLA' SURV OF POTUS [IDEN TARGET] FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF INFLUENCING THE 2016 ELECTION OF THE PRESIDENCY [NOT RUSSIA BUT HUSSEIN/HRC - PROJECTION] + SAFEGUARD AGAINST POSSIBLE LOSS OF POWER [FIREWALLS].
USE OF BACKCHANNEL SURV / SPY INSERTION [BODY 1, 2, AND 5] BY UK/AUS [PRIMARY] ACTIVATED UNDER DIR BRENNAN DIR CLAPPER W/ PDB REGULAR UPDATES + [LIVE STREAMING] WH
HUSSEIN NON-OVAL [SITUATION ROOM] COORDINATION. FISA [FULL] BRINGS DOWN THE HOUSE [WH].
Q
Ooopps! Oh well.....
Yah, wake me when someone does the perp walk.
DOJ Emails Reveal Internal Response to Wiretap Allegations Against Rosenstein
BY JEFF CARLSON
September 8, 2019 Updated: September 9, 2019
Newly released emails by the Department of Justice (DOJ) reveal details about the internal response by the agency to allegations that then-Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had wanted to wiretap President Donald Trump and invoke the 25th Amendment against him.
The allegations were first reported by The New York Times on September 2018. The article, headlined Rod Rosenstein Suggested Secretly Recording Trump and Discussed 25th Amendment, claimed that the deputy attorney general, Rod J. Rosenstein, suggested last year that he secretly record President Trump in the White House to expose the chaos consuming the administration, and he discussed recruiting Cabinet members to invoke the 25th Amendment to remove Mr. Trump from office for being unfit.
Q !!mG7VJxZNCI No.206 📁
Sep 10 2018 12:14:25 (EST)
https://qanon.pub/data/media/ee7e6648ef05a4281c0e5cdea756e309e1e486529621069d1b7589e8ad204668.jpg
Why are 'powerful' [influential] people resigning due to 'past sexual misconduct' allegations? Why are these 'allegations' now surfacing [10-month span]?
WHY NOW?
Human trafficking arrests up?
SA cooperating?
NXIVM?
When does a BIRD sing?
EYES WIDE OPEN.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/president-donald-j-trump-working-end-human-trafficking/📁
Coincidence?
Network being dismantled?
SHEEP NO MORE.
Q
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.