^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This area of discourse really worries me.
There are obviously some psychiatric cases who should not have guns, or possibly their freedom.
However, the LEFT WOULD LIKE TO WEAPONIZE PSYCHOLOGY. And it IS NOT A SCIENCE.
And I know a LOT of psychologists and psychiatrists (don't ask). For some reason they tend to be RATS.
So let's beware what we ask for.
Indeed, let's do.
Here it is about the Texas shooter.
For one thing, our local news was getting their talking points from the New York Times...they said as much.
For another, the shooter, white, of course, failed a background test, but was able to get a gun through a PRIVATE sale. Those Libs need that private sale loophole closed....
This was a FAlse flag if there ever was one.
Just thought I’d point it out.....I knew this when it happened, but no one was interested.
There used to be mental hospitals where psychotics were sent and treated, one way or another. Or warehoused.
Some people cannot exist in society due to psychosis. What do to with them? Giving them psych drugs and turning them loose is obviously not the answer for many of them.
Doing nothing about dangerous psychotics because people with “unpopular” viewopoints may be unfairly targeted is sort of like the argument that there should be no death penalty because an occasional innocent person might be executed.
Any law can be misused, any govenment agency or department (at any level of gov) can be turned into a political weapon. Does that mean anarchy is a better choice? Some people think so. (Not saying you think so, just sort of musing on the topic.)
“There are obviously some psychiatric cases who should not have guns, or possibly their freedom.”
ESPECIALLY their freedom. That’s what I take away from so many of these, people who have been in contact with LE over and over again and nobody intervenes.