To: CptnObvious
Have you listened to O’Donnell’s so-called apology? That was most definitely not a “hard” retraction. He basically admitted to not vetting the story properly and then said something along the lines of “we don’t know if this is true or not”. It sounds like O’Donnell got pranked by a kid on 4-Chan, and was so eager to damage Donald Trump and his company that he fell for the prank hook line and sinker. If he isn’t fired immediately I hope Trump sues MSNBC into the ground.
I don’t know if it’s true or not that O’Donnell tortures kittens to death for sexual thrills. I honestly don’t.
7 posted on
08/30/2019 8:32:54 AM PDT by
Junk Silver
("It's a little hard to herd people onto trains when they're shooting at you." SirLurkedalot)
To: Junk Silver
Exactly! This was nothing like a retraction, let alone a hard retraction, which is why I believe Trump's son said a lawsuit would definitely be filed and rightly so.
30 posted on
08/30/2019 9:03:02 AM PDT by
Mastador1
(I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
To: Junk Silver
Wow...I heard that too, so it must be true.
40 posted on
08/30/2019 9:26:19 AM PDT by
david069
To: Junk Silver
I dont know if its true or not that ODonnell tortures kittens to death for sexual thrills. I honestly dont. but, IF TRUE, he could be classified as a pussyphile
To: Junk Silver
Yes, O’Donnell deliberately left the viewers thinking that the story might be true...they just hadn’t managed to prove it yet, but stay tuned.
To: Junk Silver
I dont know if its true or not that ODonnell tortures kittens to death for sexual thrills. I honestly dont.I heard, and if true, it sounds painful, that o'dumple has anal sex using an electric eel instead of a dildo.
53 posted on
08/30/2019 11:04:12 AM PDT by
USS Alaska
(Nuke the terrorist mooselimb savages, today.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson