It's a fantastic document and well worth the time it take to read it. (19 fast moving pages).
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL T. FLYNN, Defendant
While the defense is reviewing the massive file counsel does have, it is what we do not have that is crucial. A finding of contempt by this Court will trigger the appointment of new prosecutorsunrelated to the Special Counsel investigation or the U.S. Attorneys Office for the District of Columbia, which is now equally implicated in the suppression of evidence favorable to the defense. 13 As in Stevens, counsel expects that in a matter of weeks, new and untainted counsel for the government could find and produce the evidence the current team has hidden.Go Sidney!
Nicely done.
I’m thinking, continued references to the Stevens case are intentional.
It was Judge Sullivan who reversed the Stevens case and ripped the prosecutors new butt holes.