No, but I am a PhD chemist and understand science and scientific evidence. I have seen NO, NONE, ZERO hard evidence of any "GMO" negative consequences in forty years of scientific practice. "If" any had ever been found, it would have been all over the peer-reviewed science publications.
You say it exists......show me!
40 years is hardly an adequate sampling period in terms of evolution, now is it?
No one at monsanto has seen any hard evidence of negative GMO consequences and everyone knows that peer-reviewed journals never publish anything that isn’t true, nor do they refuse to publish anything that might interrupt the revenue stream.
The hubris of scientists almost equals that of the churchmen.
PhD = Piled Higher and Deeper
Hi Wonder
My problems w GMO are in foods that we eat everyday.
The very Chemicals that they are resistant to are incorporated into them. Plants have many natural defenses and have those same chemicals in their fruit and fiber, we have introduced new chemicals that we may or may not be able to process internally and yes Monsanto is the largest of the companies to do so.
Roundup may be harmless or it may be a real killer... I would choose to not be a guinea pig... IF I was given the choice