https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7381203/Man-posed-Clinton-dress-painting-speaks-out.html
Man who posed up for THAT Clinton in a dress painting speaks out: French model says he was ‘stunned’ to learn the now infamous artwork wound up on the wall of pedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s $56 million New York home
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7380929/Epstein-gamed-grave.html
How Epstein gamed the system from beyond the grave: New will put more than $577m in assets into a trust fund that ‘makes it more difficult for his accusers to collect damages by making beneficiaries private’
FTA:
By putting his fortune in a trust, he shrouded from public view the identities of the beneficiaries, whether they be individuals, organizations or other entities. For the women trying to collect from his estate, the first order of business will be persuading a judge to pierce that veil and release the details.
...
Bloom said it was ‘gross negligence’ on the part of Epstein’s lawyers and jail personnel to allow him to sign a new will, given that he had apparently attempted suicide a short time before. Bloom called a will ‘a classic sign of impending suicide for a prisoner.’
...
Typically in any case, trust or not, there is a pecking order of entities that line up to get a share of an estate, said Stephen K. Urice, a law professor at the University of Miami. First in line would be the government - in Epstein’s case, several governments - which will collect any taxes owed on his properties and on his estate itself.
Next would be any other creditor to whom Epstein owed money, such as a bank or mortgage company.
Lawsuits against the estate by victims would come into play somewhere after that.
Epstein’s only known relative is a brother, Mark Epstein, who has not responded to requests for comment. It is unclear whether he was named a beneficiary.
One other possibility is that the U.S. government will seek civil forfeiture of Epstein’s properties or other assets on the grounds that they were used for criminal purposes. Government lawyers would have to produce strong evidence of that at a trial-like proceeding.
If they prevailed, they would be able to seize the properties, sell them and distribute the proceeds to victims.
‘The fact that there is a will should not stop them,’ said Cheryl Bader, a professor at the Fordham University School of Law.