Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Telepathic Intruder
The star explodes.

Fusion reactors on Earth require creating supernova conditions. Is that really a good idea? Instead of meltdowns we might have to worry about whole mountains exploding into the sky.

31 posted on 08/17/2019 12:29:08 PM PDT by Reeses (A journey of a thousand miles begins with a government pat down.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Reeses

Fusion reactors on Earth require creating supernova conditions.


Say what? Fusion does not equate to supernova.


32 posted on 08/17/2019 12:33:10 PM PDT by sparklite2 (Don't mind me. I'm just a contrarian.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

To: Reeses

No, the conditions that produce a supernova are far more extreme than what’s needed for fusion. There is a connected between the two processes, though. It’s the energy from fusion that prevents a supernova from occurring in a star. It’s only after fusion has run its course that the core finally collapses to atomic nucleus density, triggering the supernova. The energy release is also far greater, up to 10% matter to energy conversion, as opposed to only 0.7% in hydrogen fusion.


34 posted on 08/17/2019 12:52:42 PM PDT by Telepathic Intruder
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson