^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
I'm not saying Zero will walk. I only suggested he might be left out of the initial phalanx of indictments.
We all KNOW YOU ARE RIGHT ABOUT THE FRAUD ... but I'm having trouble imagining what kind of hard evidence remains to PROVE THIS IN A COURT OF LAW, AS WELL AS COURT OF PUBLIC OPINION. (Eye witnesses are mostly gone; they've had a decade to scrub the documentary evidence.)
Moreover, I don't know what legal consequences would follow, even it it were indisputably proven.
Legal doctrine of Estoppel would prevent his acts as President from being vacated. I'm positive the SCOTUS would take this position (or something similar), even if RBG is replaced.
I think we'll have to be content with establishing Obama as one of the leaders of a major conspiracy to unlawfully abuse Government powers and subvert the Constitution.
There is hard evidence.
What about Quo warranto? (sp?)