Posted on 08/15/2019 8:11:19 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Amid a downturn in the cryptocurrency markets, the apparent swathe of Bitcoin sell-offs from a $3 billion Chinese Ponzi scheme could be to blame.
On Aug. 14, Dovey Wan — founding partner of blockchain-based investment company Primitive Ventures — called attention to the ongoing mass sell-offs from the fraudulent Chinese investment scheme, dubbed PlusToken.
10 million investors scammed of $3 billion
As Wan outlines, PlusToken was created in mid-2018 and promised high yield investment returns at different rebate percentages to its four tiers of member — a classic Ponzi scheme structure. By early 2019, the project claimed to have over 10 million members.
Wan has attached data on all the wallet addresses — including Bitcoin (BTC), Ether (ETH) and EOS — known to be associated with PlusToken and urgently called on exchanges and over-the-counter platforms to blacklist them.
She notes that Chinese police hunted down a core team member of the scheme two months ago and have revealed that investors were scammed of a whopping $3 billion.
Alongside the addresses, Wan has attached investigative data from security audit firm Peckshield that reveals the money flow from PlusToken’s wallet as of early July, the date the sell-offs are thought to have begun:
Incessant sell-offs Despite the arrest, the cryptocurrency cannot reportedly be rolled back, as Wan explains:
“Many of their BTC addresses are started with P2SH which commonly used for mutil-sig, most likely some ppl who hold the keys are not being caught hence police can’t unlock the wallet. For EOS/ETH wallet can be diff case but so far police was not able to touch any of those.”
In an attempt to curb the impact of the sell-offs, she has recommended that Peckshield and blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis analyze the flows more closely, noting that PlusToken appears to be moving their funds in small batches of 50-100 BTC into exchanges.
Chinese traders have reportedly claimed that an unknown address has in recent days been dumping 100 BTC incessantly on crypto exchange Binance, which Wan suspects to be connected to the scheme.
As just reported, the PlusToken scheme was identified as being the largest single incident of loss in a recent summary of 2019 crypto-related theft from blockchain security firm CipherTrace, having purportedly defrauded investors of $2.9 billion.
No way. Lol.
I think I’ll create my own cryptocurrency and call it “BitTulip”.
I think I’ll create my own cryptocurrency and call it “BitTulip”.
~~~
BitZeppelin
oh wait
Bit coin, what a joke.
Mean people suck.
I think the article means that the Chinese government pumped and dumped bitcoin. Any corporate endeavour that involves China involves the Chinese government.
“I think I’ll create my own cryptocurrency and call it “BitTulip”.”
well, BitTulip would certainly be joining a crowded field: here’s a list of over 2,000 cryptocurrencies that are supposedly actively trading:
https://coinmarketcap.com/all/views/all/
It’s not currency. Governments issue currency. Calling it “coin” doesn’t make it currency. Some merchants accept it. Ultimately, it’s converted into standard currency.
As a way of telling the government to go to hell, bitcoin just isn’t the answer.
I’m selling “Bit Food.” It is more valuable than “Bit Coin.”
You can’t eat it, but you can sell it for more Bit Coin.
>
It’s not currency. Governments issue currency. Calling it “coin” doesn’t make it currency. Some merchants accept it. Ultimately, it’s converted into standard currency.
As a way of telling the government to go to hell, bitcoin just isn’t the answer.
>
Though ours still purposely mints, I haven’t seen anyone take a gold, let alone a silver, coin OTC either....yet, those Fed. Rsrv. ‘green backs’ are still called ‘currency’.
The diff. between fiat FR 0/1 & a BitCoin 0/1 is...?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.