I’m with you. I *LIKE* Sean, but I fully understand everybody’s grievances with his style. I don’t like it either, and actually find myself turning to the local alternatives lately. But I do like him and think he’s doing great work.
Sean’s value is his line up of guests. It is they who many tune into, to hear. They are experts and respected conservatives.
Without them, I’m not sure of the numbers who would watch anymore, just for the pleasure of watching HANNITY run on with his hype and his emotions, alone.
As Bigg Red noted, his ego is a factor.
He simply will not respect time for his guests to but barely make a point, before Interrupting, and ALWAYS steals their work product by First giving to himself their work product, or their thesis, or their column titles, before he bothers tp introduce them, before they ever get to lay their own foundation. He already used their thunder for himself, in his blathering preamble to introductions.
But for his guests, his FOX ratings would be down around his ankles.
“I’m with you. I *LIKE* Sean, but I fully understand everybody’s grievances with his style. I don’t like it either, and actually find myself turning to the local alternatives lately. But I do like him and think he’s doing great work.”
+++++++++++++++
i agree with you an have often wondered myself if he’s part of the q team. i’ve read q, then listened to hannity to see if there are any similarities in the “voices.” i don’t know, i just get tired of him saying nothing sometimes. i like rush, too, but get so tired of him talking for 5 min then listening to 10 min of commercials. but the interview with kaiser wilhelm was bind boggling really and this defense of fredo is also bind boggling. there was nothing classy or worth defending regarding fredo. he was out of control.
I do agree that hannity does good work. and maybe it’s one of those keep your enemies closer thing??
(i’m leaving bind boggling in lololol. broken arm syndrome hahaha)
petey