Why?
You think creation disproves evolution?
You think evolution disproves creation?
I don't, I think the most logical possibility is the BOTH happened.
There is proof of both.
In my opinion the universe was created and life has evolved since then. Anyone trying to convince you otherwise has an agenda
...crevo comes to, of all places....Q....
Flynn Intel Group Case Highlights Mueller’s Lack of ‘Collusion’ Evidence
When the final report of then-special counsel Robert Mueller stated that it couldn’t establish that anyone from the Trump campaign had conspired with Russia, many Americans may have failed to realize how revealing a statement that was.
The recent conviction of a former partner in the now-defunct consultancy firm of Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn, former national security adviser to President Donald Trump, shows how easy it would have been for Mueller to bring charges even if he could piece together only a circumstantial case.
Yet he didn’t.
Conspiracy
Despite its ominous sound, the federal charge of conspiracy has a low bar to clear. If two people agree to commit any federal crime and if they undertake any, however trivial, “overt act” to further the plan, they can be charged and sent to prison for up to five years, even if they never actually committed the contemplated crime.
“It is a low bar,” said David Duncan, criminal defense lawyer from the Boston law firm Zalkind Duncan & Bernstein. The “overt act” in particular can be something “minor or innocuous-looking,” he said.
If two people discussed a plan to rob a bank, for instance, and one of them went to buy duct tape that, in the government’s eyes, was to be used to tie people’s hands during the robbery, that could be an “overt act.” At the purchase of the duct tape, a charge of conspiracy to rob a bank could be forthcoming.
The case of Flynn’s former partner, Bijan Rafiekian, seems a prime example.
Excerpt
Let me gently suggest this is not the thread for this debate.
That subject has been argued, and will continue to be argued. There are multiple threads for that. Debating this topic is not our purpose. Our purpose here is to piece together the clues from the posts to research the present darkness in our institutions, expose it, and bring about the great awakening.
Do not become like the Californians, who want to save the world, but ignore their dams and water supplies, and allow plague and pestilence to take over their cities.
We need to fulfill our mission.
My dearest Big Bob, Two things which make mutually contradictory propositional truth claims cannot both be true.
The definition of true is: That which corresponds to reality:
One makes the propositional truth claim "God created all things". The other makes the contradictory claim "God did not create all things".
If one of these statements conforms to reality the other cannot possibly be true. Pick which one you believe...no problem, but you cannot logically hold to both.
Spontaneous creation of life..random genetic mutation...undirected natural selection all combine to equal:"God is not responsible for the genesis or diversity of life which we observe on this planet". This is the claim of Darwinism.
That is a contradictory and mutually exclusive truth claim as opposed to creationism so there cannot possibly be evidence for both.
P.S.: No Q and no Forbidden City so minor slide.
#philosophy101