I thought for sure she would be fired\disciplined over epstein being offed.
Then I saw her facebook profile... So now I think 50-50.
> I thought for sure she would be fired\disciplined over epstein being offed.
> Then I saw her facebook profile... So now I think 50-50.
The main point is that prior to this information, I had thought surmised that skipper-scott was merely in the wrong place at the wrong time, and had been advised to lay low.
Now with this new information, I think skipper-scott has still been advised to lay low, but not just because of the Epstein incident but also possibly because of other similar incidents which had occurred under her watch at Fed BOP.
This incident did not show up in initial web searches. So, someone else has been digging and along the way filled the google search engine cache with this decision. A few hours ago, the only case I saw involving Skipper-Scott was this one (an old employee case against Holder that I mentioned earlier in a prior post):
https://www.law360.com/cases/50eb0969a895c03c02000001
(Someone with access to Lexis-Nexis and some spare time can perhaps search more to see if any other cases mentioning Skipper-Scott turn up.)