Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: All

trump and administration imho could not have passively acquiesced to an epstein hit. besides epstein himself (innocent until proven guilty and deserving due process), too many innocent possible epstein victims would be affected by denying their right to see him face his day in court for alleged crimes.

another possibility is a body switch, but that has some of the same problems. technically, it is illegal and it violates due process.

that leaves 3 more options. (1) suicide; (2) a hit with insider help. (3) a hit without insider help.

(1) and (2) have been hashed around already. I am wondering about (3). i looked at the warden (skipper-scott) facebook account. it does not seem to reveal anything unusual, not to mention nefarious. as of an hour ago, it was still up, although with a couple of inquisitive comments. my tentative conclusion was that the warden probably had no direct active role in the epstein hit, but that she might have been a convenient patsy who was simply sidelined, along with lax procedures and lax enforcement of those procedures. apparently skipper scott is an interim warden and just treading water in that position, while waiting for a permanent warden to be appointed.

a hit without insider help would leave open that the perps could be brit or israeli actors.

if it was deep staters, then they are (besides attempting to cover their tracks somewhat in the open) sending trump a message, that we can reach out and touch almost anyone we please. that if true is somewhat frightening to contemplate...


1,996 posted on 08/11/2019 1:29:03 AM PDT by SteveH (intentionally blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SteveH

“trump and administration imho could not have passively acquiesced to an epstein hit.”

While they may not have acquiesced, they may have gamed it out and decided not to take extraordinary measures to prevent it.

1. If they decide the larger goals were still served (perhaps better) if he died,
2. If preventing his death could not easily be done,
3. If allowing his death created more evidence trails to the guilty,
4. If allowing his death expedited legal challenges,
5. If there was evidence the Epstein wanted to die,
6. If Epstein is not the key player that needed to be brought to justice for victims to have their day in court,

then it makes sense that they would decide to stand down and refuse to intervene.


2,001 posted on 08/11/2019 2:26:07 AM PDT by mongrel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1996 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson