FWIW, the manifesto was not posted on a board that had anything to do with Q. It was posted on /pol/
I do understand that knocking down the whole domain to get one sliver of it is probably the only tactic that would work to remove /qresearch/ and related; and too, that 8chan is a particularly obnoxious cesspool.
DU is pretty obnoxious too, and I can think of many other opinion and debate sites I’ve viewed that have cesspool-like qualities, sometimes the remarks following MSM online articles, and certainly twitter any moment of any day.
FWIW, the manifesto was not posted on a board that had anything to do with Q. It was posted on /pol/
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Can there be any doubt it was an attack on Q?
I understand the implications of this. It means the shooter was a tool, a weapon, who could be directed by someone at will. It’s very alarming.
Then there’s this:
8chan owner says El Paso shooter didn’t post manifesto
https://www.cnet.com/news/8chan-owner-says-el-paso-shooter-didnt-post-manifesto/