Posted on 07/30/2019 5:29:03 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda
Suburban women recoil as Trump dives into racial politics
ROOKFIELD, Wis. (AP) — Carol Evans approves of Donald Trump’s immigration policy. She gives him credit for the strong economy. But the Republican from the affluent Milwaukee suburbs of Waukesha County, a GOP bedrock in the state, just can’t commit to voting for the president next year like she did in 2016.
“I just don’t like the way he talks about other people,” Evans, a 79-year-old retired data entry supervisor, said recently as she walked through a shopping mall in Brookfield, Wisconsin, days after Trump fired off a racist tweet at Democratic congresswomen.
The president’s recent return to racial politics may be aimed at rallying his base of white working-class voters across rural America. But the risks of the strategy are glaring in conversations with women like Evans.
(Excerpt) Read more at apnews.com ...
Well you can say that this person doesn't exist and that they made her up if you want. My opinion is that she does exist and the only question is whether people like her are as widespread as the paper would have us believe or not.
Exactly! He did mathematically lose suburban women in 2016. Most suburban woman who voted for Hillary spend their time either shuttling the kids off the daycare for some $15 an hour person to raise their kids so they can commute off to some middle manager job where for 60k she spends the day in meetings and gossiping with her other coworkers, wasting the company's money. Or live a house with a hubby with half a brain and can afford her the time between Yoga classes and getting her french manicure done to ponder her navel without having to work at all.
All for revoking the 19th amendment.
The next election hinges on who the Dems put up against Trump (obviously), and how people on the fence actually vote when they are alone in that voting booth. A lot of people say one thing in front of a camera, but when no one is around they change their tune.
Suburban women would recoil if Trump had said “ass” or “fart”. They have no stomach for what is required.
More spin. Not once did Trump mention race. He’s talking about actions ... not skin color. Yeah, Boston is a rat-infested problem. And yeah, Sharpton is a con man. What does that have to do with race?
They’re pretty shallow thinkers I don’t think that they would even contemplate that. They have a herd mentality are very much go along to get along.
LOL then who will she voted for. Someone she deems a non bully that will jack the country up by reversing Trump policies? Or not vote at all, which is only going to help liberals? When push come to shove and its time to vote...its hard for me to believe Donald Trumps crassness will supersede his ability to lead and build in the eye of those who voted for him in 2016.
This is fu—ing bu—sh-t.
AP = Asinine Propaganda
“days after Trump fired off a racist tweet at Democratic congresswomen.”
Who says it was racist? A couple of AP losers who require two to write this drivel? Lol. DNC operatives hard at work for their masters at Demoniac headquarters.
So says Levy and Bauer
Regardless, it's the downfall of the Republic if it's future is up to the feelings of generally spoiled politically isolated/ignorant women.
Trump fired off a racist tweet at Democratic congresswomen.
Fiction
Trump fired off a tweet at Democratic congresswomen.
Fact
AP is in need of a editor
But didn’t you see the old western movies where the guys were firing those lever action 30-30s and not flinching?
I had the same experience as you, on my first shot. Left a bruise.
I wouldn’t get too put out by suburban women. It’s very likely this story has been fabricated or at least twisted and spun to paint a picture. Want to get riled? Get riled about the media deceptions, distortions, and out-right lies.
“...eah, Boston is a rat-infested problem...”
I think you meant Baltimore? Boston’s pretty clean, comparatively speaking. The only thing infesting Boston is over-privileged Leftists.
Do suburban women want rats in their burbs?
Carol Evans doesn’t know that Trump is our Winston Churchill? She needs to learn some history.
Libs never get tired of lying and cheating. Get ready for a redo in 2020 of the 2016 fake-new presidential polls, which I've listed below:
Nate Silver’s FiveThirtyEight - Clinton 71 percent chance of winning
L.A. Times - Clinton 352, Trump 186
Moody’s Analytics - Clinton 332, Trump 206
Sabato - Clinton 322, Trump 216
Princeton - Clinton 228, Trump 164
Fox News - Clinton 274, Trump 215
Associated Press - Clinton 274, Trump 190
New York Times - Clinton 85 percent chance of winning
Reuters - Clinton 90 percent chance of winning
ABC News - Clinton 95 percent chance of winning
Rasmussem - Clinton +2
NBC News - Clinton +6
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.