Sleepers,gotta love it.
Why am I posting this before the Declass? Why not Post it. ACLJ released this today,, so it makes me free to release my documents as well. They will all be arrested soon anyway. The word on the street is “Watch those rat’s run”
Out of darkness into the Light !
Who has the Server? What Server? The Clinton server that was lost in the “chain of custody” evidence? where did it go?
This is the Server Trump has been asking about since 2017.
Not the DNC server, the Clinton Server. Again, Anons had it all wrong. Saying “We have it all” is categorically NOT TRUE. We are talking about the bleached Hillary emails here. not the DNC emails, HRC bleached emails are paramount.
Context of Related ACLJ FOIA Litigation on Comey/Lynchs Sham HRC Investigation
It was in this same lawsuit that the ACLJ sought and succeeded in obtaining the release of multiple records showing Comeys various draft exoneration statements prepared weeks before the FBI had even interviewed Hillary Clinton or Mills and Samuelson. As the ACLJ reported, The bombshell document entitled on the FBIs records Vault as Drafts of Director Comeys July 5, 2016 Statement Regarding Email Server Investigation is a completely redacted draft copy of fired FBI Director James Comeys statement exonerating Hillary Clinton from criminal liability.
And it was this same lawsuit in which the ACLJ uncovered FBI records revealing that the FBI had lost the chain of custody of one of Clintons email servers, and that the original chain of custody was missing for two months. As we had explained, The chain of custody in a criminal investigation is critical. It ensures there is no tampering with the evidence. But for two months no one knows where this server was or how it was secured.
Also, the ACLJ was at the forefront of exposing the attempted coverup that followed then-Attorney General Lorretta Lynchs secret meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac of an Arizona airport just days before Hillary Clinton was interviewed by the FBI and then exonerated shortly thereafter. After Comeys FBI replied to our legal demands that No records responsive to your request were located, the DOJ produced records to us containing email communication with the FBI a.k.a. FBI records. The ACLJ, and the public attention these developments received, forced the FBI to reopen the case and admit that records potentially responsive to your request may exist.
Our work and success in this case have been widely reported (e.g., here, here, here, and here) (including AG Lynchs use of an alias email account).
As an editorial in The Washington Times put it, Lynch plunged her department and the White House into a panic when a local reporter got wind of the meeting. We finally know a bit more about it, thanks to a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit pursued by the American Center for Law and Justice.
Among the records the ACLJ obtained were redacted talking points the DOJ had shared with the FBI about the secret tarmac meeting. In fact, the ACLJ recently filed its opening brief in our appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit challenging the redaction of those talking points. Right before its response brief was due, the FBI caved and provided us with the talking points it had previously withheld.
George M. Nasif
https://www.facebook.com/george.nasif/posts/10217575140545266