To: af_vet_rr
And we had Von Braun. He not only had the knowledge, he had the vision.
The Russians did have Korolev, and, if the Russian/Soviet mentality had allowed it, they would have made it much closer. But he was hamstrung, and, Did the best he could with the tools he had.
37 posted on
07/26/2019 5:13:19 PM PDT by
Conan the Librarian
(The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
To: Conan the Librarian
The Russians did have Korolev, and, if the Russian/Soviet mentality had allowed it, they would have made it much closer. But he was hamstrung, and, Did the best he could with the tools he had.
I don't know how accurate this is, but folks I know from the Air Force, and a couple of friends from NASA, have mentioned over the years that Korolev's strengths, at least towards the end, was more in the organizational aspect, and less on the technical side, and it hurt their chances of putting a man on the moon. My impression was that it led to them having a ridiculously complex system that most engineers would assume would fail.
It's odd that the nation that gave us the AK-47 and MiG-15, could produce a rocket with 5 stages, with a base of 30 engines. Maybe it was a case of Korolev getting too many resources. Soviet engineers did their best work when they had severe limitations.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson