Dek may well be and probably is correct. I don’t know.
That means he serves as a 4th source, as opposed to reading an additional 5th source indicating that the Epstein cell lost power, but the Chapo cell did not, which was interpreted as making it crystal clear it was not Chapo who was in danger of possible dangerous targeting, but a signal that it was only Epstein.
I can’t bank anything on very many of these initial reports. Four days or more may eliminate some of the early implications and resulting inferences.
These are basically already known facts by those who were There but obtaining them is a circus.
I say this with some humor, btw, thinking Keystone Cops.
Tales from the life of Bagster:
Just as a possible FYI.
When the power goes out in a so called 'modern lock-up', at least in the one I worked in, the electric doors sometimes have a tendency to become unlocked.
Whenever the power would go out in our facility, it would become almost totally pitch black. And remember each floor housed about 500-700.
We would kinda panic as we collected our flashlights and walked back in the pitch black to the 'Hi-power' unit (10 one man cells with the worst of the worst. Kinda hoping they wouldn't all be roaming around stabbing each other, then turn their attention to us.
And they didn't like us all that much either.
Life is an adventure.
I wonder what kinda setup they got where Epstein and Guzman are at.
Super max high security admin seg PC, no doubt.
Bet they got eyes on 24-7 too. They better anyway. I'd pay the overtime.
Speculation time.
If the power went out, it would easy to justify how Epstein got shanked by blaming it no the power outage.
Also, wouldn't be hard for the derps to contract it out to a someone housed close to him.
ALSO, and this is a big maybe, what if the people who MAY HAVE caused the outage, messed up and flipped the wrong switch, causing the outage to miss its target.
Okay. That's my whack theory for the month. How'd I do, G?