What Did Alex Acosta Mean When He Allegedly Said That Epstein Belonged To Intelligence?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3762996/posts
Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day hed had just one meeting on the Epstein case. Hed cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epsteins attorneys because he had been told to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. I was told Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone, he told his interviewers in the Trump transition, who evidently thought that was a sufficient answer and went ahead and hired Acosta.
BREAKING
Alexander Acosta To Speak Amid Jeffrey Epstein Accusations 2:30pm Eastern
I caught that too, which would mean he's probably a black op intelligence asset or an asset of the central banking system cabal. Which would explain the discussion where he was an asset to blackmail celebrities, politicians, the rich and powerful, etc., here in the U.S. so the cabal can go about their corrupt business.
CGato