Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Swanks
"In it he can’t hold back his disdain for Longstreet"

The old post-war, anti-Longstreet cabal that wanted to glorify Lee and blame Longstreet for the Gettysburg defeat. Jubal Early was a prime participant in this. A good book was published this year called "Longstreet at Gettysburg" by Cory Pfarr which takes a close look at the charges leveled against Longstreet and refutes them all.

86 posted on 07/03/2019 3:47:10 PM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]


To: circlecity

I’ve been working my way thru Pickett’s Charge by George Stewart. He writes:

“Lee and Longstreet were generally together on this morning, riding about and inspecting the lines. The inference would have to be that the tactical planning was a collaboration.”

I don’t understand how any rational blame can be put on Longstreet. Jubal Early would deserve more. Which may be why he blamed Longstreet!


99 posted on 07/03/2019 5:21:22 PM PDT by Mr Rogers (Professing themselves to be wise, they became fools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

To: circlecity
Jubal Early was a prime participant in this

Yes Gen. Early was fighting the war, unrepentant to the very end. He did to speak and/or visit with Lee though (who would calm him down on occasion, when he'd write Lee, going CRAZY about something he read, or something someone said). Lee was an incredibly mature individual who saw the big picture; telling him they (Confederates) have to suffer in silence now, so the next generation will not.

101 posted on 07/03/2019 5:56:46 PM PDT by Swanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson