That’s the problem. We can have good policies and laws in place, but the government bureaucrats ignore them.
Stu Cvrk
....
There are bound to be more people indicted, as Epstein’s indictment refers to unnamed individuals who facilitated procurement of minors, and other victims are said to have come forward since the indictment was announced over the weekend. Let the chips fall where they may!
....
Ok, more Epstein. This bombshell still has a lot of potential play in it, especially with Slick Willie going public with a weak-a$$ denial that he knew anything about the alleged pedophilia:
....
On Monday, the Department of Justice (DOJ) unsealed the indictment against financier Jeffrey Epstein, revealing the sexual abuse and trafficking case against him.
....
The unsealed indictment revealed key aspects of the case against Epstein, potential charges against his unnamed employees, and allegations of a conspiracy that could ensnare the financier’s vast network of powerful contacts.
....
Here are six key aspects of the indictment.
(1) The indictment mentions three unnamed minor victims.
(2) The indictment also mentions three unnamed employees who allegedly scheduled the girls for sexual encounters.
....
(cont’d)
The counts against Epstein date from around 2002 to around 2005.
....
[T]he abuse usually began with a victim being escorted to a room with a massage table.
....
(cont’d)
Epstein not only paid the girls for “massages” that involved sexual abuse, but also encouraged them to find more minor women for the same abuse.
....
(cont’d)
“Jeffrey Epstein, the defendant, and others known and unknown, willfully and knowingly did combine, conspire, confederate, and agree together and with each other to commit an offense against the US, to wit, sex trafficking of minors,” the indictment reads.
It is obvious that congress and past presidents often pass laws they have no intent of enforcing, or intend to selectively enforce for political reasons.
They enact some laws so they can convince voters they care about an issue when they really don't.
How many times do we hear them brag about voting for a bill when they haven't improved anything at all?
We're lucky if they pass a law that doesn't make things worse!
Look at the E-Verify as an example.
If they really cared about stopping employment of illegals wouldn't they make E-Verify mandatory?
Other laws are enforced selectively as tools or weapons against those they disagree with.
Consider the way the Patriot Act has been used by the federal government to harass, oppress, persecute and prosecute innocent American citizens who are political opponents.
Or the way the IRS used its power to persecute conservative organizations in the Obama era.
And the Post-911 laws requiring US citizens to provide detaied I.D. documentation to renew a drivers license.
And how we have to provide I.D. documents and jump through hoops to fly by commercial air.
But illegal aliens are permitted to get a drivers license and fly by commercial air with no personal I.D. at all.
And American citizens are required to submit to personally invasive TSA patdowns while muslims are exempted!
It wasn't American citizens who killed 3,000 people with hi-jacked jets on 9-11!
.