Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: mairdie

“...Judge George Hazel, an Obama appointee, had previously ruled against the question,...”

Does this mean that Judge Hazel will now be —for— the census question?


1,594 posted on 06/19/2019 5:46:12 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57 returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1591 | View Replies ]


To: WildHighlander57

>>Does this mean that Judge Hazel will now be —for— the census question?

Why do I seriously doubt that?

My concern is how long it takes to get the SC to rule on this so the forms can be printed.


1,595 posted on 06/19/2019 5:53:29 PM PDT by mairdie (John Cocke: A Retrospective by Friends - 1990 - https://youtu.be/eYwd30iWVvw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1594 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson