Because the changes in Google's presentation of "top relevant articles for the search term 'D-Day'" - changing from virtually-all-negative-of-Trump to instead be mostly-neutral + some-positive-to-Trump, happened over a half-day, and both snapshots of the "before & after" result pages are gone forever. And it's worth preserving. Especially the part re the WaPo changing their extremely nasty article's title a few hours later, and it dropping completely from view as well. The changes imply some amount of blowback that was felt by CNN and Wapo, though apparently not the NYT. In a few days, googling "D-Day" will likely feature its wikipedia article once again in the top 2 or 3 slots, with the TDS articles down below,
Everyone else posting here seemed to like this info, and found it worthwhile. So why don't you take the wet blanket off your shoulders and go throw it in the dryer again?
I asked why.
Saying it serves no useful purpose would have required a lot fewer keystrokes and kept integrity intact.