The link only further misleads the public. By calling it Nixon’s Watergate, they are not telling the story as it is. Nixon has not been accused of planning, or even knowing about the Watergate break in, until after it had happened. His action that got him into trouble was trying to cover for people within in administration that went on their own to do the act. Nixon was wrong, but it isn’t his Watergate anymore than it was Reagan’s contras. (And I can tell you a lot about that one, too)
Obama is under investigation like everyone else within the problem. If he did it, he should be toast. If he found out about it after the fact, he should be downcast. If he knew nothing about it at all, which is really tough right now, he’s innocent and should be treated that way. But that’s the huge difference between a conservative and a liberal democratic. I believe in innocent until proven guilty and I don’t try to change history after the person is dead. And I expect the guilty parties to be punished for their pre-planned actions.....on both sides.
rwood
That is true, nixican was only looking out for those he thought
was looking out for america.
Did you mean he should be “downcast” or cast down ?