I spent some time on that video. While I can see where confusion arises, it just requires some critical analysis. The video portion shows a bright light moving from left to right across frame and parallel to the coast. Since it is sequential frames between pauses it is hard to ID it.
It is explained by the (cover?) story of the helicopter with its downward search light left on. Once you establish that it is easy to isolate the missile launch and the ascending projectile at screen left. So, both stories are true.
As to professed 'ex-spooks' - I tend to be wary and proceed with caution... e.g. Christopher Steele. They shouldn't be automatically rejected -- they shouldn't be automatically accepted.
As to professed 'ex-spooks' - I tend to be wary and proceed with caution... e.g. Christopher Steele. They shouldn't be automatically rejected -- they shouldn't be automatically accepted.
I agree and good advice on former spooks. As far as Kevin Shipp goes, I was aware of what he's been claiming about the CIA, long before Q came along. When Q came along it actually backed up many of the claims Shipp had talked about.
So I'm willing to give him a little more consideration. He's also former CIA and the Q operation, we're led to believe is NSA. Perhaps that could also be one reason he was on the fence about the Q movement, when that Youtube video was posted, because of unfamiliarity.
CGato