^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Based upon my reading of Barr (at #292), Huber is about to drop the BOOM on Hillary email investigation and possibly U1.
Wouldn't it be sweet if this names Mueller?
Anyway, it makes perfect sense to separate the prosecutions of email coverup from the prosecutions of illegal intelligence operations mounted against the Trump campaign and other Americans.
Barr is focused on the "Timeline" of the attacks on the Trump campaign, and the "Predicate" (if any) for such abuses of power.
He essentially states that the absence of evidence (i.e.,nothing being found by Mueller) is prima facie evidence of abuse of power by the "Russia" investigators.
The intelligence community is nearly done with a classification review of more than 50 transcripts from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence’s Russia investigation, a spokesperson for the Office of the Director of National Intelligence told The Daily Caller News Foundation.
“Throughout this process we have cooperatively worked with the committee to complete the review in a timely manner, and we expect to complete the [intelligence community’s] review very soon,” the spokesperson said Friday.
For over eight months, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) has pored through 53 House Intel transcripts to determine what information can be made public. It is not clear how long after the review is completed that the thousands of pages of documents will be made public.
The Intelligence panel voted Sept. 28, 2018, when Republicans controlled it, to submit the transcripts for classification review.
The committee interviewed 73 witnesses as part of its investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election. Some Obama administration officials were also interviewed about their activities prior to the election and during the presidential transition period.
Wouldn't it be sweet if this names Mueller?
It should name Mueller. He had a part in U1.
He essentially states that the absence of evidence (i.e.,nothing being found by Mueller) is prima facie evidence of abuse of power by the "Russia" investigators.
Mueller tripped over all kinds of hard evidence pointing towards the Democrats, etc. in his pursuit of evidence concerning Trump that didn't exist. What Mueller did with that evidence will decide his fate, imo.