check out this post to your article
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3751974/posts?page=12#12
Bears reposting:
“Raw meat here, you gotta read this thing...
In plain English the raw search returns were being shared with unknown entities without any attempt to “minimize” or redact the results. The person(s) attached to the results were named and obvious. There was no effort to hide their identity or protect their 4th amendment rights of privacy:
But what’s the scale here? This is where the story really lies.
Read this next excerpt carefully.
The operators were searching “U.S Persons”. The review of November 1, 2015, to May 1, 2016, showed “eighty-five percent of those queries” were unlawful or “non compliant”.
85% !! “representing [redacted number]”.
We can tell from the space of the redaction the number of searches were between 1,000 and 9,999 [five digits]. If we take the middle number of 5,000 – that means 4,250 unlawful searches out of 5,000.
That’s why the FBI small group, which later transitioned into the Mueller team, are so strongly committed to and defending the formation of the Steele Dossier and its dubious content. The Steele Dossier contains the cover-story and justification for the pre-existing surveillance operation.
Holy smoking cow!
This is the Mad Maxine “Obama Database” that she mouthed off about.
And you want a taste of how big this thing really is?
More importantly, research indicates the modern political exploitation of the NSA database, for weaponized intelligence surveillance of politicians, began mid 2012.
Yeah, THAT big.
No wonder the progs are making gibberish accusations.
This drops it squarely in little bammy’s lap.
“
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3751974/posts?page=12#12
>>check out this post to your article
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3751974/posts?page=12#12
Thanks, bitt. I’m still having trouble believing that this is becoming more public, and holding my breath waiting for the other side to make some desperate moves to divert attention.