[Lakeside Granny]

Is this for real?

Amber Athey ‏Verified account @amber_athey

SCOOP: Senior Trump administration officials tell @dailycaller that POTUS is planning on invoking the powers of the Insurrection Act in order to remove illegal immigrants from the U.S.

Spunky ‏ @BeachUSA45

8m8 minutes ago

BIG IF TRUE🔥Trump to invoke

Insurrection Act of 1807, the president has the authority to use the National Guard and military in order to combat “unlawful obstruction or rebellion” within U.S. borders. The act was last invoked in 1992 by George H.W. Bush

[pax_et_bonum]

That would be awesome.

[STARLIT]

Techno Fog ‏

Unsealed portion shows Baker and Principal Associate Deputy AG Matt Axelrod "later argued about the FBI's decision to interview Flynn"

Brian Cates

,h4>

Even in newly released documents on the @GenFlynn case, the DOJ still *insists* on redacting the name of FBI SSA Joseph Pientka.

It's been public record for OVER A YEAR that Pientka was the other FBI agent who interviewed Flynn @ White House on 1/24/17.

My first thought is, well he's likely a material witness in ongoing DOJ cases, but then again isn't just about EVERYBODY mentioned in these documents? McCabe, Baker, Strzoke, etc?

*WHY* the attempt to keep Pientka's name out of sight, out of mind?

Remember, I wrote an entire column about Pientka back in January. https://t.co/O2dyQ2ohW3— Brian Cates (@drawandstrike) May 16, 2019

I get they want to keep him under wraps, but why pretend it's not already public knowledge he was the other FBI agent at the Flynn interview at the White House?

[freepersup]

BOOM!

EXCERPT:

(1) The President may employ the armed forces, including the National Guard in Federal service, to–

(A) restore public order and enforce the laws of the United States when, as a result of a natural disaster, epidemic, or other serious public health emergency, terrorist attack or incident, or other condition in any State or possession of the United States, the President determines that–

(i) domestic violence has occurred to such an extent that the constituted authorities of the State or possession are incapable of maintaining public order; and

(ii) such violence results in a condition described in paragraph (2); or

(B) suppress, in a State, any insurrection, domestic violence, unlawful combination, or conspiracy if such insurrection, violation, combination, or conspiracy results in a condition described in paragraph (2).

(2) A condition described in this paragraph is a condition that–

(A) so hinders the execution of the laws of a State or possession, as applicable, and of the United States within that State or possession, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State or possession are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or

(B) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws.

me <> <> <> Start with the rebellion in California and New Mexico! <> <> <>

ALSO:

Relation to Posse Comitatus Act[edit]
The entire text of the Posse Comitatus Act, as amended in 1956, is as follows:

18 U.S.C. § 1385 – Use of Army and Air Force as posse comitatus

Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both.

NEED DEFINING FURTHER:

Accordingly, actions taken under the Insurrection Act, as an “Act of Congress”, have always been exempt from the Posse Comitatus Act.[2][3]