Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Lakeside Granny
he fact that no FISA Court has reacted violently to having a fraud committed on the Court, raises the issue of perhaps we had a FISA Judge, or more, who were part of this scam to take down a duly elected President.

I agree 100%. I would also add that Chief Justice Roberts, who is in charge of the FISA courts has also been silent on any criticism.

1,994 posted on 05/15/2019 10:21:15 AM PDT by gubamyster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1993 | View Replies ]


To: gubamyster; Lakeside Granny

Kimberley Strassel(WSJ) **

1) Lost in this spat is that it ignores a bigger question. There were two outrageous aspects to that Jan. 2017 briefing. One is the subject of this dispute: Who pushed to include dossier in the briefing, clearly as a hook for media to then run with the dossier allegations? ******

2) But the other outrage of that briefing was the deliberate decision not to tell Trump the whole truth--that dossier was being used as a basis to investigate members of his campaign. If FBI had any reason to suspect anyone in Trump's orbit, incoming Prez needed to know. *******

3) Especially if FBI was actively looking at Flynn, who was about to become NSA! There was no reason not to brief, since according to FBI, Trump was not a subject. Who decided not to give Trump a FULL briefing about dossier? To deliberately hide this from new commander in chief?


1,996 posted on 05/15/2019 10:26:14 AM PDT by STARLIT (Jesus is the Light of the world. In fact,there is no light other than Christ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1994 | View Replies ]

To: gubamyster

Chief Justice Roberts is of real concern.

We know that the Obummer intel had him “wiretapped” too.

So just what do they have on him?


1,999 posted on 05/15/2019 10:32:13 AM PDT by Lakeside Granny (Here is the script for our breaking Secret Service story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1994 | View Replies ]

To: gubamyster; NIKK; Lakeside Granny

Hope they have the stones for this.

from wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Foreign_Intelligence_Surveillance_Court
Read the prefacing explanation

High level info: (I don’t know if this includes continuances)

Since 1979, 85 FISA requests have been denied.
Since 1979-2002, no FISA request had been denied.
Since 2016-2017, 68 FISA request have been denied.


2,007 posted on 05/15/2019 10:45:12 AM PDT by stylin19a (2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1994 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson