To: Lakeside Granny
he fact that no FISA Court has reacted violently to having a fraud committed on the Court, raises the issue of perhaps we had a FISA Judge, or more, who were part of this scam to take down a duly elected President. I agree 100%. I would also add that Chief Justice Roberts, who is in charge of the FISA courts has also been silent on any criticism.
To: gubamyster; Lakeside Granny
Kimberley Strassel(WSJ) **
1) Lost in this spat is that it ignores a bigger question. There were two outrageous aspects to that Jan. 2017 briefing. One is the subject of this dispute: Who pushed to include dossier in the briefing, clearly as a hook for media to then run with the dossier allegations? ******
2) But the other outrage of that briefing was the deliberate decision not to tell Trump the whole truth--that dossier was being used as a basis to investigate members of his campaign. If FBI had any reason to suspect anyone in Trump's orbit, incoming Prez needed to know. *******
3) Especially if FBI was actively looking at Flynn, who was about to become NSA! There was no reason not to brief, since according to FBI, Trump was not a subject. Who decided not to give Trump a FULL briefing about dossier? To deliberately hide this from new commander in chief?
1,996 posted on
05/15/2019 10:26:14 AM PDT by
STARLIT
(Jesus is the Light of the world. In fact,there is no light other than Christ.)
To: gubamyster
Chief Justice Roberts is of real concern.
We know that the Obummer intel had him “wiretapped” too.
So just what do they have on him?
1,999 posted on
05/15/2019 10:32:13 AM PDT by
Lakeside Granny
(Here is the script for our breaking Secret Service story)
To: gubamyster; NIKK; Lakeside Granny
2,007 posted on
05/15/2019 10:45:12 AM PDT by
stylin19a
(2016 - Best.Election.Of.All.Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson