Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: C19fan

It is a story about men in the Army Air Corps during World War II.

There will, by necessity, be very few women in the story, because there were very few women at forward operating bases of the Army Air Corps in World War II.

Those women who were there were likely viewed by the young men in the Army Air Corp as young men in the military typically view women. If you want to tell a story, you have to tell the story that happened. If you try to insert 2019 sensibility into a 1943 story, it will not work.

2019 sexual politics is tedious enough. No need to export it to the past. One of the nice things about reading a story from 50 years ago is that you don’t have to wade through all of the modern claptrap. That is why my bookshelf does not have anything published after 1990.


8 posted on 04/24/2019 5:13:50 AM PDT by Haiku Guy (ELIMINATE PERVERSE INCENTIVES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Haiku Guy
If you try to insert 2019 sensibility into a 1943 story, it will not work.

Yet MASH ran for centuries and people didn't get sick of it.

Seventies/Eighties attitudinizing in a Fifties story.

I never read the book, but Altman's film was certainly misogynistic.

Alda's TV series was supposed to be feminist and was very touchy-feely in a way that was rare in the 1950s.

13 posted on 04/24/2019 5:44:27 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson