https://spectator.org/while-democrats-search-for-crumbs-this-too-will-pass-over/
While Democrats Search for Crumbs, This Too Will Pass Over
by Dov Fischer
FTA:
...
It has been Mueller for two years, and it will be Mueller for another two years. It has been Democrats trying for two years to destroy the President, and it will be Democrats trying for another two years to destroy the President. Nothing new under the sun.
...
1. The Democrats Never Will Be Able to Wrap Their Heads Around the Reality That Other People Live Outside Their Echo Chamber.
...
Against that backdrop, Democrats cannot figure out how Trump got elected in 2016. Everyone they know voted for Hillary or Jill Stein. Everyone who knows anyone they know voted that way. How could Trump have won unless there was massive cheating?
Nothing ever will convince Democrats and their Left appendages that half the country thinks differently from them, thinks Trump has Made the White House Great Again, and voted for Trump because Trump was a good choice, and Hillary was a loathsome choice.
...
2. The Democrats Will Not Stop Hounding, Harassing, and Persecuting Trump Until Election Day 2020.
...because Trump is made of the strongest mettle and toughest emotional exterior, it does not mean that he is not being persecuted.
...
All that matters is whether Trump is a great President. Hillary’s decision to release her taxes in 2016 did not make her less a crook or any less pathological a liar who lied even about how her mother named her.
...
3. There Was No Collusion.
There was no collusion.
4. There Was No Obstruction of Justice.
...
Nor was it illegal for a novice in the law like Trump to ask Jeff Sessions to “un-recuse” himself. For lay people, all it takes is a few episodes of “Billions” to suggest that a United States Attorney can recuse himself from a case, then secretly un-recuse. Trump is not a legal expert; that is why he hires attorneys. He consistently deferred to them. Nothing he did obstructed justice.
5. This All Is a Good Thing.
In preparation for Passover, Orthodox Jews are bidden to remove all “chametz” from our homes, offices, and possessions. “Chametz” includes breadstuffs, pastas, and a wide variety of grain-based leavened products. Even non-grain products are forbidden if produced in contact with “chametz.” Through the entirety of Pesach, “chametz” may not be seen or found in our possession. So we “carb up” and consume the stuff in our pantries, we clean and vacuum our homes like OCD poster kids, and we sell whatever “chametz” remains to a non-Jewish friend.
Despite all that, we go on our hands and knees the night before Passover, assuring the place is pitch-dark, light a candle, and then crawl along all walls throughout our homes, looking into crevices — whatever — in one final search for any last crumbs we might have missed. If we find crumbs, we burn them the next morning. For that one moment each year, it is Atkins/Keto Diet Nirvana. And then we bring out the matzo.
For the past two years, Nancy Pelosi, Adam Schiff, Elijah Cummings, Robert Mueller, Jerrold Nadler, Maxine Waters, CNN and MSNBC and the New York Times and Washington Post and all the rest of those dregs have been searching for the chametz in Trump’s cabinet. They bounced Sessions, imported Mueller and Weissman, got Clapper and Communist Gus Hall’s John Brennan who was Obama’s CIA chief, brought in Avenatti and Cash Cab Cohen, Omarosa here, James Comey there, Strzok and Page and McCabe — dreck in and dreck out — and they have not found a morsel. They will not stop.
If President Trump, his family, and associates can hold the fort, this persecution will become a blessing.
...
Looking back, this seems inevitable. But it HAS to be stopped!
AP U.S. History textbook calls Trump “racist,” questions his mental stability
I have written repeatedly about the hard-left bias in the teaching of AP American History. I finally got tired of writing such posts and abandoned the beat.
But now, I learn that, beginning in 2020, many Advanced Placement students will be using an American History textbook that suggests President Trump is mentally ill and that depicts him and many of his supporters as racists. The book asserts that “[Trump’s] not very-hidden racism connected with a significant number of primary voters.”
What connected with a significant number of primary voters was Trump’s strong opposition to illegal immigration and his concern over terrorists entering the U.S. The textbook effectively characterizes these concerns as “not very-hidden racism” and those who share them as racists. This is controversial, to say the least. I consider it slanderous.
The textbook goes further. It says that Hillary Clinton supporters “worried about the mental stability of the president-elect.” Some did, or claimed to. But many Trump supporters worried about whether Clinton compromised our national security by criminally using a private email servers. Some McCain supporters worried about what they considered (with good reason) Barack Obama’s socialism and his undeniably communist mentor.
Does the textbook air these concerns? I doubt it.
The textbook clearly is using “Clinton supporters” as a device to plant the idea that President Trump is mentally unstable, a proposition for which there is no basis other than raw hatred of the man.
The book’s publisher defends its handiwork, saying that it underwent “rigorous peer review to ensure academic integrity.” No doubt.
The “peers” clearly share the blatant partisanship and mindless anti-Trumpism of the textbook’s author. If they didn’t hate Trump, they wouldn’t be peers. They would be academic outcasts.
The book’s hateful insinuations and assertions about Trump and those who voted for him are unacceptable in a text used to teach high school students American History. Any school in which the book is used should be the target of vigorous protests. The political blowback should be fierce.