That's too bad, Bags was quite the warrior and Patriot on the deleted anti-Q thread. Maybe he was ganged-up on behind the scenes because he was so effective on that thread, who knows.
That anti-Q thread targeted those who don't understand the lies the OP was spreading about the Q movement. I remember a similar organized anti-Trump resistance when Candidate Trump was introduced on FR. It was brutal but in the end, logic and the truth won out.
I do believe the same thing will happen with the Q movement, especially being a true MAGA movement and a great back channel of good info for "We the People". President Trump continues to claim, "Promises Made, Promises Kept. Those who follow Q have an even greater understanding of just how true this is.
One other observation from that anti-Q thread. When FReeper M. Thatcher posted the NSA pic with the Q in the background (it was posted several times for the anti-Q folks on that thread), the anti-Q posters just completely ignored it. I was expecting them to downplay or ridicule it but they didn't seem to want anything to do with it. I suspected they knew what it meant and didn't want to bring anymore attention to it. The danger was those who aren't up to speed about the Q movement might put 2 and 2 together and figure out there might be something to this Q movement.
The point of that thread was to keep the lies about the Q movement out there but I'm glad they failed miserably. Bagster and others were great defending the Q MAGA movement on there, WWG1WGA!!! Hopefully he'll be back soon.
CGato
I need MY BAGS BACK I need FREE REPUBLIC BACK
One thing I've noticed is how NASTY these Q-niers are, typically. It's a tell. I'm not talking about the agnostics or even the skeptics. I'm talking about those who are so invested in their QDS that they will spend an entire day furiously posting, typing their fingers to nubs.
Pro-Q people are (overall) characteristically just nicer.