“Lol you claiming you’ve seen the Fisa docs”

I did not claim that, apparently you have trouble with reading comprehension. I said FISA abuse has already been made public, which of course it has, since Congressmen and others have already revealed improprieties in the FISA warrants.

“I wonder what me Senator Graham and Senator Feinstein know that you don’t?”

Everyone, not just Q-tards, knows that military tribunals have been used against FOREIGN terrorists. Many of us also know that there were already legal battles fought over the issue of using military tribunals against US citizens accused of colluding with foreign terrorists, and the courts ruled that those US citizens must be granted due process rights. That is why the Bush and Obama administrations ended up trying those cases in civillian courts.

Of course that jurisprudence is actually not relevant, since the whole basis of the argument is that the Congressional use of force authorization after 9/11 gave the authority to try people as enemy combatants before military tribunals, but that legislation doesn’t apply to people simply accused of violations of our criminal laws, even in the case of high treason. That’s why it’s a total fantasy by the Q-crowd that this will happen, and nobody with any understanding of the law in this country thinks the idea is plausible in the least.

In fact, if that stunt was actually tried, whichever President did it would actually be practicing tyranny and violating the US Constitution. So it’s hardly a path any actual conservative would be hoping for Donald Trump to pursue.

“Don’t worry you’ll know soon enough it has to be frustrating for you being months behind the news curve”

Your precious Q predicted these military tribunals were going to happen well over a year ago, and of course his predictions failed as they always do. It’s not going to happen, the sooner you accept that, the sooner you will stop looking like a fool.

Of course that jurisprudence is actually not relevant, since the whole basis of the argument is that the Congressional use of force authorization...

You act like you know the level of treason and sedition. I put it to you that you have no idea, sir.

Would you call a foreign government, like say, the UK, conspiring to overthrow a duly elected US President an act of war?

Would you then consider any US citizen who conspired with that foreign power to be waging war against their own country? And perhaps plotted and even attempted to assassinate a sitting President in collusion with said foreign power?

My point is this. Stop talking like you sit on the Supreme Court. You don't. These questions will be decided in the Supreme Court at some point in the future.

You can bet your nalgas on that.

Because these acts did take place. How do I know?

Again, Q told me. The choice to know is yours.

And....scene.

Goodnight gentlemen. It's been a pleasure.

Best line of the night? "It was a helicopter".

Still crackin' up on that one.

Good thread, romanesq. We'll have to do this again someday.

Like Matt Damon told John Malkovich in "Rounders", "Cause I can keep bustin'you up all night".

Farewell, and have a good day.

😃

The sooner you stop convoluting what Q says With what others claim Q said

The closer you will be to honesty

***************** Here's What was actually posted

Notice it doesn't have a date but an event

***************** MUELLER > DECLAS > OIG > TRUTH > JUSTICE

***************** First Mueller report then declassification then OIG report then Justice

*************** Try again

*************** Sorry you wasted all that time typing a long useless reply...

*************** But the ad hominem was a nice touch

***************

Of course I pay attention to what the president says not some lame troll that claims everyone agrees with them

***************

*************** *************** Trump accuses some who investigated him of ‘treasonous’ actions

*************** President Donald Trump on Monday accused unnamed people involved in the Justice Department’s special counsel investigation of “treasonous” acts and said he is not opposed to the release of Robert S. Mueller III’s report.

He also vowed that unnamed individuals that played a role in the Justice Department’s actions related to his campaign and Russia will be “looked at.” He did not explain what that might mean, but he alleged those people committed “treasonous” and “evil” acts.

***************

So you Stick with the msm and the mouse in your pocket that agrees with you. I'll stick with POTUS