LOL
Yes, he worked with the PAC for less than a quarter; done. He left to go work for Fox TV.
He did the one event and he was paid for that event and another which didn’t go anywhere as he left for a TV gig.
There’s nothing remotely illegal about any of it. People have a right to take opportunities and Seb Gorka came and went. He went to Fox and apparently returned a payment as he wasn’t going to do any more work in any future event.
So he got two payments for less than three months involving one full event and another related to the Horowitz weekend. I just dug through some FEC PDFs.
Big deal.
The only grifting is with your false idol, #QAnon taking boomers for a ride.
LOL
So why did the records state "consulting fees" rather than "whatever event".
Your argument is getting less strident as you become less sure of your facts, sir.
I don't blame you, though. It's one thing to come across all blustery and Doctor Know-It-All and quite another to have your B.S. challenged with the actual facts YOU cited in the first place.
Consulting fees are not "events".
You can look that up.
What do you make of this line in a Q post regarding your precious money laund...er, I mean PAC.
Monthly installment payments made to ‘names’ who can attract ‘more donations’? (the “wheel”)
So they pay Gorka for "consulting" and he's such a big 'wheel' that other people donate to the PAC because his name's attached.
So basically, Gorka did nothing but sell his name so the PAC could increase incoming cash. Again, that's a real world lesson for you.
That's just part of the whole PAC scam. And what do you make of what bukkake Cates said about paying that ex convict and known fraudster all them duckets? Nothing? Is bukkake all you got on that one?
And then there's this, from Q, in the same post.
Track donations vs. expenses.
Admin, fundraising, strategy & research, etc etc expenses highly inflated?
Monthly installment payments made to ‘names’ who can attract ‘more donations’? (the “wheel”)
How much ‘donated’ money was actually spent promoting MAGA / PRO_MAGA candidates (indirectly) vs. internal costs or ‘wheel’ costs?
Pay attention to the term "inflated costs" and the question about how much "donated" money was actually spent promoting MAGA and PRO MAGA candidates as opposed to internal costs and wheel (Gorka) payments.
And now we come to the crux of the matter. The "why" of Gorka bad-mouthing Q.
When you offer ‘better’ goods and services for free there is no longer a need to ‘donate’ ‘purchase’ and/or ‘follow’ those who would use such platforms to enrich themselves. (hence the ‘attacks’)
Q says here that the Q team offers "better" goods and services (MAGA) for the low, low price of NOTHING, than these organizations (and a host of other so-called paytriots like Jerome Corsi, Alex Jones, and our very own LS).
Bottom line is, Q cuts into these people's profits because he offers a "better product" for no cast, and THAT's why the fake MAGAS of the world talk trash on the legitimate entity that is Q.
We find this phenomenon all throughout the political world and over the internet. As people vie for "followers" and "donations". From Twitter, to YouTube, to cable television, and even to so-called MAGA pacs.
Calling yourself MAGA don't necessarily make you MAGA, btw. MAGA means a specific thing, and we all know whaet that is. And lining your pocket ain't on the docket.
And that is why that article at the top of this thread exists and why you are extolling it and Gorka and the MAGA Coalition's virtue so vigorously.
Is that enough truth for you all at once?
Let that sink in before you pop off with some dopey cliché which you've repeated ad nauseum all along this thread.
