Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bagster

“You refuse to look at readily available proof...”

No, as I said, I’ve already looked and plenty of these so-called “proofs” and found them all extraordinarily wanting. So I have no reason to believe any more of them will suddenly be compelling, especially since Q has already been proven a fraud many times over.


671 posted on 04/12/2019 10:45:21 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 662 | View Replies ]


To: Boogieman

And yet here we are 600+ comments in and you still haven’t proven one of you alleged “proofs”

All have been shot down like the Whidbey island missile (I mean helicopter wink wink)

Or Your hearsay crap that someone said someone else said something

And my favorite a picture on airforce 1 isn’t a picture of airforce one cause there are other pictures of AF1


674 posted on 04/12/2019 10:53:07 AM PDT by BiggBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies ]

To: Boogieman
I’ve already looked and plenty of these so-called “proofs”.

No. No you haven't. Or we wouldn't be having this conversation. I, with my own eyes, have ACTUALLY looked at them, and unless you think I'm a complete retart, I'm here to tell ya, they are indisputable in the aggregate.

So no, you didn't look at them. That's just science.

And no. Q has not been "disproven" as much as you like to say it has. In fact, quite the opposite.

But you continue your slumber. CNN will tell you what to think.


688 posted on 04/12/2019 11:33:06 AM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 671 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson