“I have yet to see evidence to convince me that it’s anything but a creative writing exercise.”
That is because you and so many others never even look for the evidence. When you do see it then you ignore it. Your mind is already made up. A mathematician could take the time to do a statistical analysis of all the Q events/post that tie to Trump tweets and words. They would conclude that there is no mathematical possibility in the entire universe that they were all coincidence.
Sadly I doubt that you could name even one of those dozens of examples in order to debate if it were real or not. And yet you all feel like you are experts.
No, it’s because when I do ask for evidence I get told things like I haven’t been looking for evidence and not having it is my own fault. In other words, the kind of circular logic you find in a cult. If Q proponents showed one piece of evidence for every hundred times they talked about how much evidence there is, they wouldn’t find perfectly reasonable and open-minded people like myself thinking they got suckered by an internet prank.