Replies

What I have observed is that some “Q decoders” are better than others, some get caught up in conspiracy theories of their own inspiration, while others do very good research and seldom get caught up chasing rabbits down rabbit holes.

And so far most Q debunkers turn out to be phonies.

I don’t include Gorka in that category because I like him. But he is confused. Nunes’ memo was in fact very revealing. Podesta’s emails are very revealing. Twitter? Check out James O’keefe. Twitter is going after people they don’t like, and threatened to shut off Trump himself.

If you read Q like Nostradamus, you aren’t going to get it. If you just allow that he is giving a hint of what is going on behind the scenes, then the news headlines never surprise you, you already had a heads up what is going on.

Actually, thanks to FR, I almost always know more about what is happening than the news folks on TV or print, and as a result I almost always understand what Q is saying... his cryptic comments aren’t that cryptic to an FR news junkie. I get pretty much exactly what he is saying.

I don’t include Gorka in that category because I like him. But he is confused.

Gorka could be involved in some kind of disinformation/deflection campaign for reasons unknown to us.

As for some phony "anons", especially on 8ch, there are many who are only there to disrupt and discredit the work real anons are undertaking. Shills and trolls. Deep state operatives or just plain morons. The mistake non-q people make is lumping everyone together. Like Q says, use logic, use reason. Some shills are real obvious but some are quite clever. One has to beware. What I like is the volume of really good research that occurs and since everything is anonymous, no one has a need to "take credit", to be rewarded. The work is its own reward.

I've followed it daily from "drop" #1. My interest in the "anons" and the "chans" began shortly after they repeatedly located and took down Shia Lebouf's "He will not divide us" flags. A truly amazing story (see link below...language warning).

Here is my take on Q. Much of the crime info on the drops is legitimate. I believe this was discovered through illegal hacking...thus the cryptic nature of many posts, to protect THEMSELVES from hacking charges. Most of the "what's coming" info (trust Sessions etc.) is bull because THEY ARE NOT WHO THEY SAY THEY ARE, and DO NOT HAVE INSIDE KNOWLEDGE.

Trump in a bind over this...he DID after all promise to arrest Hillary. So he is silent so far.

My 2 cents.

The amazing international 4chan vs Shia Lebouf capture the flag game