Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv; All
Christians willingness to care for others and to take risks on their behalf is one of the things that led to the increasing numbers of Christians in Rome.

During plagues, many Romans would flee the cities if they could. It was "every man for himself". Many could survive the plague with only minimal care, such as providing water and a little food.

I highly recommend The Rise of Christianity by Rodney Stark. It is a sociological book that examines how Christianity won over the Roman Empire.

10 posted on 04/08/2019 2:02:56 PM PDT by marktwain (President Trump and his supporters are the Resistance. His opponents are the Reactionaries.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: marktwain
Contrast this to muslim "charity" in Indonesia after the Krakatoa eruption.

The muslim "aid" workers would sit on stores of food and watch infidels starve all around them, unless they converted to islam, only then would they get any food or other aid.

Off hand I'd say it was at least as effective a conversion tool as the Christians in plague ridden Rome.

Today Indonesia is the world's largest islamic country, after all...

12 posted on 04/08/2019 2:10:54 PM PDT by null and void (If socialism is so grand, why are Guatemalans coming here instead of going to Venezuela?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
That presupposes that no one had previously had willingness to care for others, and that's nonsense.
One reason epidemics are so devastating is that not enough people flee.

13 posted on 04/08/2019 2:13:50 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson