Thanks Steve W
What is the value of the Mueller Report if we don't know what he was SUPPOSED to do? In other words, we are grading a work product without knowing the basis of the assigned work. Shouldn't we start THERE with the redactions?
Thanks Steve W
What is the value of the Mueller Report if we don't know what he was SUPPOSED to do? In other words, we are grading a work product without knowing the basis of the assigned work. Shouldn't we start THERE with the redactions?
I’m OK with it remaining hidden if it means that [RR] & the Mule are not all that they appear.
I’m also again reminded about Sara Carter once referring to different sets of books.
Regardless of who/what/which/when/where/how etc. - if you have MIL and others involved in unmasking the DS - you can’t have things laying out what they’re doing as potentially exposed to the DS. There must be variations of certain things such as a FISA that is “recorded” and the DS thinks it is what it is (or is not) - while having other (REAL) sets of docs & communications that are actually part of the (anti-DS) ops. Meaning even seeing something or any given thing may not (will necessarily NOT) be the whole picture.
It’s quite the movie!
Sitting alongside Barr (vs. other person behind) = Lee Loftus - Assistant AG - seems to have Barr’s back.