Posobiec needs to have his words not just rubbed in his face but shoved down his throat. Soon!
Posted on 04/06/2019 11:54:06 AM PDT by ransomnote
https://i.imgur.com/UtGO3qW.jpg
Apparently Posobiec thinks Barr’s testimony disproves Q’s genuineness somehow.
That guy is a plant.
Ha, he learned from me, but he’s a crappy learner.
Nice!
I found mention of this little item on QResearch:
~~~~~~~~~~
“Al-Imam originally faced a single count of conspiring to
provide material support to terrorists resulting in death.
But the Justice Department last year quietly brought a 17-
count superseding indictment charging him with murder in the
deaths of Ambassador Chris Stevens, communications
specialist Sean Smith and security officers Tyrone Snowden
Woods and Glen Anthony Doherty.”
“The new charges virtually mirror those brought against
Khattala, who was accused of driving to the diplomatic
mission on Sept. 11, 2012, and breaching the main gate with
militants who attacked with assault rifles, grenades and
other weapons. The initial attack killed Stevens and Smith
and set the mission ablaze. Woods and Doherty were later
killed at a CIA annex.”
~Easy
Posobiec needs to have his words not just rubbed in his face but shoved down his throat. Soon!
Could Burma reference indicate Hillary’s impending doom?
That could suck all the air out of the room for a year or more.
Somebody was saying it’s when you can see the white over both the top and the bottom of the irises, it’s crazy time.
Too bad this mohammedan vermin can’t be executed multiple times.
He is pure black, backed into a corner only when he came under the supervision of Barr (and Whitaker) and forced to justify what he was doing to people who weren’t part of the plot. He would have continued for years if Barr hadn’t come along. One of the first things Barr did was meet with him and ask some pointed questions. Q gave us a transcript of that meeting, or a summary. Based on the answers to those questions, the jig was up, and he acquiesced to preparing a final report. Even that, he stretched out to weeks, instead of days, to give time to indict Roger Stone and hassle some other folks.
I don’t altogether mind the speech restrictions. I don’t want to have to put up with a lot of liberal crap on a conservative site. I only oppose the speech restrictions I don’t like! :-)
Maybe there’s a 5 count indictment of Hillary that ends with the line, “Burma Shave”.
Some suspected that he died at an unspecified time and the body kept on ice until a politically expedient moment. In fact, there is curiosity as to whether many important personages are preserved in cold storage until time to trot them out for a funeral to change the news cycle. Cynical, I know.
Oh, and the Comey tweet was reckoned to be a coded message to the Skull & Bones network of what had happened, far in advance of the announcement.
Just that turd romanesq obsessing over a larp.
Q lives in a mansion in that guy's head. And is adding a new wing.
Sanpaku Eyes (Three Whites):
If the sclera is visible above or beneath the iris, making the iris bounded by sclera on three sides, it is called Sanpaku Eyes or Three Whites Eyes. There are two kinds of Three Whites Eyes: Upper-Three Whites (sclera is above the iris) and Lower Three-Whites (sclera is beneath the iris). The latter is most seen. Looking terrifying, this kind of people is usually adventurous, cool, cunning, and venomous. They have a strong personality, would like to sacrifice anything to gain the aim. So, many of them have a great achievement in society. Better don’t challenge this kind person because he is touchy, violent and suspicious.
Four-Whites Eyes:
If the sclera is visible both above and beneath the iris, making the iris bounded by sclera on four sides, that is Four-Whites Eyes. Compared with the people of Sanpaku Eyes, the Four-Whites Eyes’ people have much stronger personality and more destructive and vindictive. They are cruel and poisonous, at the same time rather difficult to approach.
QResearch notes Assange in the news in Spain...
Spanish Police Probe Extortion Scheme Involving Surveillance on Assange
UPDATED: Suspects are being investigated in Spain for having tried to extort €3 million from WikiLeaks in exchange for a huge cache of documents and surveillance videos of Assange inside Ecuador’s London embassy, including with his doctors and lawyers.
A Spanish judge is investigating an alleged extortion scheme in which suspects in Madrid offered video and audio surveillance to the editor of WikiLeaks in exchange for €3 million, WikiLeaks said on Wednesday.
The surveillance was taken over the past year inside the Ecuador embassy in London, where WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has legally been granted political asylum since 2012, said Kristinn Hrafnsson, the WikiLeaks editor, at a press conference in the British capital. Included in the “trove” of material was a copy of a legal document regarding Assange’s defense strategy that was briefly left behind in a conference room in the embassy, Hrafnsson said.
“It is a grave and serious concern when legal meetings are being spied upon and legal documents are stolen,” he said. “That is something that not even prisoners have to endure.”
Assange was also filmed being examined by his doctor in the embassy, Hrafnsson said. “Nobody expected that this was recorded and stored and found its way to some dubious individuals in Spain,” he said.
Just thought of something about Putin. Here’s a snippet from Wikipedia:
“Putin was born in Leningrad during the Soviet Union. He studied law at Leningrad State University, graduating in 1975.[6] Putin was a KGB foreign intelligence officer for 16 years, rising to the rank of Lieutenant Colonel before resigning in 1991 to enter politics in Saint Petersburg. “
Did KGB do what the CIA seem to be doing, planting intelligence officers in the government to increase control by other means?
Or was that just rumor?
Any 8chan nerdlings got the scoop?
For reference:
2776
Q
!!mG7VJxZNCI
17 Feb 2019 - 7:02:02 PM
Barr to Mueller:
“Bob, show me the evidence and reasoning for why this investigation was started and still ongoing.”
Mueller to Bart:
“With regards to the President we have found no links or ties to any foreign entity etc”
Barr to Mueller:
“Mandate was clear - verify and investigate reports of possible foreign collusion between President & Russia.” “What justification existed to effectively launch a massive domestic / foreign surv campaign against the President (pres elect / president) and members of his transition / campaign team?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Steele dossier along w/ media corroboration of those findings.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was the Steele report a ‘trusted and verified’ report per Intel to continue especially considering the funding party was the opposition party?”
Mueller to Barr:
“Those facts were never taken into consideration.” “FISC granted auth to conduct based on conclusions presented.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Was FISC made aware of all details surrounding the dossier?”
Mueller to Barr:
“No.” “We believe there was urgency placed on the auth given the gravity and timeline of events that those involved negated to populate fully.”
Barr to Mueller:
“Why were efforts made to continue investigating the President, interrupt his official capacity in governing, if the only doc presented was unsubstantiated and unverified?” “Why were questions and threat of subpoena communicated to the President if no factual foundation existed?”
“All charges thus far are unrelated to the original mandate - why are you still active and pursuing a crime if no verifiable evidence or evidence through discovery exists?”
Barr to RR:
“What justification did you have to effectively expand the mandate, not report that expansion to Congress, in order to seek a crime outside of R collusion?” “What specific reasoning and/or facts existed to justify the appointment of a SC to begin with per the law?” “Why did you recommend to Sessions that he should recuse?” “Why wasn’t the mandate / budget and regular updates provided to Congress upon request?” “Why is everything kept confidential and under inappropriate classification?” “Was the purpose of investigating to find a crime vs investigate evidence of a crime?”
CLAS 1-99
Q
>>5234560
https://mobile.twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1097350271188062208
Do you believe in coincidences?
Kitchen is HOT.
Q
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.