https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1114847719955124224.html
I had no idea about the Ignatius’ role in bringing down Gen Flynn. But given that it was a second contact from a US paper on the same day, I was very suspicious. My partner issued a statement on my behalf which is a flat denial of any inappropriate relationships with Gen Flynn (9
Ignatius responded he understood. And nothing was published, because as he told me later, he interviewed witnesses at the ‘Flynn dinner’ and found nothing (10).
WSJ published their lies, followed by the Lying Luke from the Guardian. I contacted Ignatius to ask if he is planning to publish anything, and he said no as there is nothing and that if anyone else contacted me, to say he investigated and found nothing (11)
Roll forward May 2018, and Halper is exposed as FBI operative. Ignatius writes ‘I’d like very much to ask you about Halper’. We spoke, & I caught him off-guard with a direct question: did he know he was a spy? To which he said ‘I always found him very reliable’, then hung up(12)
Next thing I know Tom Hamburger to Cambridge on a tidy up mission. WaPo must have a big budget to keep flying reporters across the pond to go after Gen Flynn and protect Stef Halper! (13)
Hamburger tries to interrogate me AGAIN over the Flynn dinner. I refer him to Ignatius. Then he tries the Kremlin penetration of the Cambridge Seminar line. I read him out Halper resignation email proving that Halper did not tell the truth (14)
We row for days. I tell him he is about to publish smears and untruths. He claims he has spoken to Richard Dearlove but later admitted it was ‘sources close to’ Dearlove, not Dearlove himself (15)
I told Hamburger (&have it time-stamped): ‘You reveal you have not had contact with Dearlove. So if the principals in the story have not confirmed their knowledge/statements personally, then the journalists do not have evidence, but only hearsay, and this should be stressed. (16
I also told Hamburger that Halper’s false allegation about Russian intelligence penetration of the Cambridge seminar has been investigated by outside Counsel and found ‘no case to answer’. I said ‘If anything, FBI (Halper), not SVR “penetrated” the Seminar.’ (17)
I also confirmed that Gen Flynn DIA liaison Dan O’Brien had been on the record with WaPo to confirm he left 2014 dinner with Flynn and nothing happened. Now let’s turn to what Hamburger wrote (18)
‘During a dinner Flynn attended, Halper and Dearlove were disconcerted by the attention the then-DIA chief showed to a Russian-born graduate student who regularly attended the seminars, according to people familiar with the episode.’ (19)
No mention of the fact that his colleague Ignatius interviewed everyone at dinner a year before, and there were no concerns. Interesting... (20)
So in turd-polishing 6 page article of May 2018, WaPo suppressed vital information: Halper has history of not being truthful. He did not tell the truth about his resignation, made up stories of Kremlin penetration, Gen Flynn and I etc (21)
I’ve previously made numerous complaints to the WaPo and have been ignored. So now I call on the @washingtonpost to retract the story by Tom Hamburger and print everything they know about the #Russiagate hoax. (22)
Separately, there has to be a public inquiry into the alarming links between WaPo reporters and those with access to Classified Information. (23). THE END
***************************************************
NIKK..part of the thread.
https://video.foxnews.com/v/6023568532001/?playlist_id=3386055101001#sp=show-clips
Rep. Devin Nunes on his op-ed: The Russian collusion hoax meets unbelievable e
**********************
HERE IS THE TAPE..........Sunday Morning...on Maria’s Show.
Just started following Svetlana on Twitter yesterday.
Glad you are reading her too.
Don’t know enough to make a judgment, but she sounds like she knows what she is talking about.
Catherine Herridge featuring her is also a plus.
Thank you. The media people that were involved in this coup need to be outed and jailed.