Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: bigbob

Sounds like a decision made by prosecutors who felt that while the evidence did not show Jussie committed a crime, it did not exonerate him either, and that there wasn’t sufficient proof to prosecute him.
Just making a point about prosecutorial discretion.


Sounds more like his lawyers negotiated a deal, if it indeed was contingent on his forfeiting $10k and doing community service.


111 posted on 03/26/2019 9:03:30 AM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: lepton

It’s almost certainly a plea deal. That also explains the seal.


119 posted on 03/26/2019 9:04:57 AM PDT by TexasGurl24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson