Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: generally

The thing that I find most curious, puzzling, amazing, confusing, needing an explanation is this:

How is it that Brennan (et al), could be absolutely adamant that Trump colluded with Russians, but now that the Mueller report is out, it’s “oh, never mind”, “oopsie”. Like Roseanne Rosannadanna.

What is it about the RM report that flipped the switch? Why would he have been so clueless that he was in danger until then? Couldn’t ANY of these people see this coming? Sheesh! It’s like every single FReeQ here knows 100 times more than the former head of the CIA!! We should all apply for that job!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

I”ve been wondering about that too. Perhaps when Mueller filed those indictments against POTUS’ children, the white hats did not acknowledge them and the black hats thought they got past under the radar. With each day that passed and no hint that the white hats knew they had been filed, the black hats might have grown more confident that they could stop POTUS. Then the indictments were withdrawn and THAT was the point of “no more ammo,” because sadly, more false flags are possible, but no more show stopping hostages (POTUS’ children).

That’s why I wondered if Maddow appeared to be crying out of sudden fear for herself following Barr’s summary release- she didn’t look like she was surprised or even angry.

Q has said they are acting shocked to defend themselves from accusations of collusion (I assume Q meant in the court of public opinion, this way if charged with collusion, their audiences can recall the shock and heart break they portrayed). So I may be wrong about Maddow - maybe it was ALL acting for her audience, but if I was partially correct there may have also been sudden fear that POTUS’s children are no longer hostage.

Maybe Brennan et. al. are saying, “never mind” because they want to contrast their attitudes with POTUS’; they are portraying POTUS as irrationally vindictive about this injustice right at the time Brennan would like to “move along” the narrative to some other treasonous slander.


621 posted on 03/25/2019 8:22:22 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies ]


To: ransomnote; generally

Imho... Brennan had Obama and the White House who in turn had the Justice Department, who appointed (through stooge Rosenstein) one Robert Mueller.

Brennan had every reason to Delight in nailing Trump to the wall prior to the conclusion of the Mueller investigation. He thought Mueller was another Comey. Period.

They all thought, from the White House down, that they had essentially the Brennan Machine working inside the Mueller FBI team that they thought were Strozk x 12. Review the allegiances of that entire Team. They were all viciously Hillary supporters at All costs and Trump Haters by all actions.

The better question is How did this team not plant or coerce enough of some shreds of planted or coerced Evidence, enough to at least call a Grand Jury, against Trump or Trump JR., or any other associate. They Found Nothing, because they planted nothing and they coerced Nothing.

Did Mueller have his team bugged and surveiled, or what? I find their exonerating conclusions Extremely curious, given its composition of no one but haters, no one but Big Democrats. Otherwise, this outcome is one more God thing— a MIRACLE.

The exonerating Conclusion Knee Knocked Brennan to the ground. Brennan KNEW. Brennan knew in that moment, that the Justice Department is now coming after him.

Something held that Team in check. What was it really? I sure don’t know. But, thanks be to God and miracles.


659 posted on 03/25/2019 10:31:25 PM PDT by RitaOK (Viva Christo Rey! Public Ed & Academia are the FARM TEAM for more Marxists coming, infinitum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies ]

To: ransomnote
***That’s why I wondered if Maddow appeared to be crying out of sudden fear for herself following Barr’s summary release***

I predict that perhaps 50 media figures, major and minor, may face legal involvement for colluding with the Hillary campaign et al to affect the outcome of the 2016 election... possible conspiracy to commit treason.

Think Maggie Haberman (NYT) going through 'burner' phones and possibly trying to hide bribes in off-shore accounts.

DECLAS!

817 posted on 03/26/2019 8:39:50 AM PDT by Bob Ireland (The Democrat Party is a criminal enterprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 621 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson