Neon on RGB audio
But something was bothering me about this clip, and I wasn’t sure what it was exactly, so I returned to it early this afternoon…
I had it playing in a tab on my browser when I clicked ahead, and suddenly heard what I thought was a repeat of audio I had just heard.
“Huh, that’s weird…” I thought to myself.
I clicked back and listened again.
There was that voice again.
Kagan’s voice!
I clicked forward…
Kagan AGAIN!
Listen for yourself. Start at ~21:25 and wait for Kagan to come in and say:
Ms. Johnson, some-
And then click forward to ~22:38. Again, you’ll hear:
Ms. Johnson, some-
I had to see what was going on, so I went to the Supreme Court’s site, and pulled the MP3 of the arguments from there:
Steven W. wrote:
“Neon on RGB audio
But something was bothering me about this clip, and I wasn’t sure what it was exactly, so I returned to it early this afternoon…
I had it playing in a tab on my browser when I clicked ahead, and suddenly heard what I thought was a repeat of audio I had just heard.
“Huh, that’s weird…” I thought to myself.
I clicked back and listened again.
There was that voice again.
Kagan’s voice!
I clicked forward…
Kagan AGAIN!
Listen for yourself. Start at ~21:25 and wait for Kagan to come in and say:
Ms. Johnson, some-
And then click forward to ~22:38. Again, you’ll hear:
Ms. Johnson, some-
I had to see what was going on, so I went to the Supreme Court’s site, and pulled the MP3 of the arguments from there:”
Where’s the rest of it?
What did the MP3 of the Supreme Court argument say?
“...Someone is EDITING the oral arguments heard at SCOTUS in a way we’ve never been publicly aware of, before.
They inserted RBG’s audio.
The waveforms PROVE that beyond a shadow of a doubt, and anyone who tells you otherwise is selling you a bill of goods...”
Ok she would have to be working from home & calling in, for this to be pulled off; too many people to fool otherwise.
Holy cannoli! Someone's having the recording(s) edited to insert RBG!