I thought the blockade was the Mueller investigation as if he did anything libs would scream obstruction. Is there a link to indictments on his kids? I thought Q asked a question about that but never saw that it was done.
Well, Laurel, I think we all thought that and wondered why oh why doesn’t he just fire that special counsel and take care of business and the only plausible reason was the opposition outcry of obstruction. Now we come to find out the real reason was because the special counsel had filed sealed indictments against some or all of the President’s children, as a way of holding a gun to their heads - holding them hostage!
Now he has manipulated the situation such that they are all out of the way. Barr came on board and flatly said you are not unsealing indictments on the Trump kids, and that was that.
WINNING! I like winning, winning’s better than losing. Losers are ok, I’m sure some of them are very nice people but I like winning. The Donald doesn’t lose because the Donald is a Winner!
Ya, Q pretty much always presents information in the form of a question. I think he's a jeopardy fan.
He STRONGLY HINTED that Mueller sent over sealed indictments in the time between Sessions and Whitaker, when he didn't have adult supervision. Q STRONGLY HINTED that Barr had the authority to "pull" previously filed indictments and then STRONGLY HINTED that Barr in fact DID pull indictments on Ivanka and Don Jr.
And tonight, Q posts that Trump's children were being used as a shield (for the derps) and that THREAT was removed when the BLOCKADE (in the form of Mueller) was no more.
Now, we can choose to believe Q is telling the truth (I do), or we can continue to believe that Mueller is somehow working with Trump in some elaborate scheme to throw the derps off the scent.
Either way we choose, I SAY AGAIN FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME, doesn't matter. Trump, Q, and Mueller know who's who at that zoo are acting accordingly, not matter who wins shiny nickels out here in internet land. No