“Then I looked at it after Q post 3108 and those replies were lower and the Ryan Hill posts were on top”
YES, and you would think people would have gone there to say “You’ve been Q’ed!”
And what bitt notes is key here and why I grabbed the other screenshot then, too.
1. Observations here of what’s happening in real time.
2. Then “Q” posts with link to POTUS tweet - NOTE that “Q” had not yet linked to the tweet which came about 40 minutes after the last “Q” post with the flag.
3. When I first checked the tweet after generally posted, I noted this Ryan DS “account” was all over, no Krassensteins.
4. Generally noted that they’d been overtaken by the “qanon76” reply. I grabbed the screenshot & posted. At this point it’s “qanon76” in the lead.
5. I grabbed the screenshot & posted here.
6. “Q” then posts their own screenshot with the taunt.
7. As bitt notes - we have seen servers crashed before. When “Q” posts that link there are at least 10K people immediately on it and would have jacked that thing through the roof. Does “Ryan” DS “account” have that kinda reach?
8. But, then, as now, the “qanon76” post is LOWER.
9. It defies possibility OTHER THAN manual direct intervention, programmed anti-competitive embedded in Twitter’s censorship algorithms, or both.
It could/would also involve some intervention by white hats that’s also speculated above, turning on, turning off ... but it’s one thing to have programming that’s deviant & unlawful and another to make an overt, deliberate act - or, maybe, BOTH. All TBD of course ;)