[I want to know]

Link to Cohen documents.

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7709849/united-states-v-cohen/?filed_after=&filed_before=&entry_gte=&entry_lte=&order_by=desc

[MNDude]

Posting blind:
I have seen a lot of talk about the vanishing brass. I saw the video in slow motion and I was skeptical if someone put that together afterwards.

Here is the full shooting video.

https://my.mixtape.moe/onzxeu.mp4

At 8:56 the brass vanishes in mid air. This video is absolutely absolutely fake!

[Steven W.]

Thanks for the link to the docket

Here is the *main* search warrant: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/7709849/43/1/united-states-v-cohen/ (269 pages)

So far most everything is about taxi medallions.

Once it gets to alleged campaign finance violations, Pages 39-57 are REDACTED.

[Defiant]

I just skimmed through it, and when I got to the part that describes the allegations about campaign finance fraud, the ENTIRE section, many pages long, is redacted. The rest of the application relates to financial crimes, understating income in connection with bank loans and such, and there are very few redactions of that part. It sets out in great detail what we already knew. The investigation was started by the Mule to look into Cohen for illegal campaign contributions. Then, from there, financial crimes were found. The case was sent to the SDNY and they took it from there, breaking in and taking all Cohen's stuff like good gestapo. The press phonied up the Stormy Daniels story in order to get this result. They may have been working hand in glove with Mule from the beginning of this whole story. The whole thing reads like part of a phony plot to take down Trump, which it was. The campaign finance stuff was not a crime, just a pretext. They searched and found some minor misstatements in financial apps that you would probably find in 95 percent of all loan apps submitted to banks in the US. Fudging here, omitting there. Cohen underreported his income, not over reported, as is usually the case. Not only that, no bank lost any money, so there was no harm to any bank. Usually, these things only matter to a US Attorney when a bank loses money from fraud, not when they make a loan that is performing and is in no danger of default.